If you need to hire a court reporting service and you are looking for the right selection criteria, you will find two counseling schools: one that tells you to evaluate court reporting services and one that encourages individual court reporters to evaluate them. In this article, we present selection criteria for selecting the best individual court reporter, because whatever the reputation of a court reporting service, it is ultimately the reporter’s quality that will leave you satisfied or dissatisfied with your hiring decision. There are two classes of screening requirements that can be added to the list of prospective court reporters according to law firms and organisations dealing for court monitoring services: technical expertise, and outstanding integrity and credibility. We get more info on Court Reporting Services near me.
While various forms of legal proceedings require specific levels of court reporters’ professionalism, all court reporters have similar qualifications, beginning with state qualification. State certification shows a reporter has passed a certification test that attests to his or her court-reporting knowledge. A minimum typing speed of 200 words per minute is also a critical requirement. Although depositions may be lethargic, when a witness speaks quickly and gives long answers they can also be quickly paced. The computer skills and research skills are a third essential requirement. A writer may require certain technical technology investigative skills that other court reporters don’t need, based on the kind of coverage you do. The writing and proofreading capabilities are another important necessity. Reporters perform proofreading and editing prior to delivering a transcript to ensure accuracy and cleanliness of the transcript. Since anyone can claim to possess editing and proofreading skills, it is best to ensure that the development of those skills is part of the official training of a reporter.
Exceptional reputation and professionalism
Any law firms and organizations make the mistake of thinking the nature and attitude of a court reporter is meaningless. While reporters seldom engage with witnesses, their degree of poise, integrity, and reverence may indeed affect the quality of a deposition. Just as judges and lawyers are not immune to prejudice, bias and adversarial thinking, so are not court reporters either. Aside from potentially interrupting a witness and sabotaging the line of questioning or misportraying the nonverbal behavior of a witness by an attorney, reporters lacking professionalism can also be a technical nightmare for reporting process. Less than professional reporters have done everything from showing up for depositions in unprofessional attire to arriving late and not delivering transcripts on time. To judge the integrity of a reporter or lack of it, it is a good move to examine their previous experience of work and not merely focus on the appraisal of their actions by their employer.